Dead Poets Remember and Inspire


The movie Dead Poet’s Society came out during the summer between my junior and senior years at University of Michigan.  Formative years for me and for the young men in the movie. Impressionable – oh so impressionable.  1989.

 

And for that reason alone, has always been a favorite of mine…if not all time favorite.  And, I found myself watching it again recently, of course…

 

I remember connecting with Robert Sean Leonard’s character for many reasons.  For my struggles with homosexuality within The Word of God Community and UCO; for my perceptions of my father, so desperately wanting his approval and acceptance (when ironically it was always there, just not as vocal then as I wanted…); for my past years as a thespian, wondering what am I doing here as an engineer?  Oh so many connections. And for the struggles with rejection, depression and thoughts of suicide. These were the best of times, and the worst of times… 1989.

 

Then, full circle, Robin William’s untimely death due to his own depression comes at a juncture in my life where I’ve lost some focus and direction.  I’ve decided to close the Candlestick House chapter for now at least, and that has created a vacuum.  It’s been a tough month…

 

I’ve also had to face the grim realities of my feeble attempts to find and live in community, a concept so foreign and allusive to me.  (Thank for rubbing my face in that F.  Got the message…your ego landed that one, sans compassion or empathy.  But, I needed to hear it, so…I accept the gift in its brown wrapping!)

 

I run because it’s what I do best, and yet I’m running from the very fabric I so desperately want to feel covering and connecting me.

 

I want to turn the concept of “community” into a workshop or project, when in reality I simply need to focus on living it.  Each day. Simply.  Like a garden.

 

Very hard for me to fathom after 45 years of life patterns, social skills and addiction.

 

And I also find myself facing an almost insurmountable collection of affairs and boxes from my own down sizing in 2011, as well as the belongings from my mother’s estate which were set aside and stored for the transitional living house that never materialized.  And amidst those boxes, a firestorm of chaos left by a “monkey” I let into my circus, who robbed me and let my home become the pigpen of a somewhat demented soul while I was on vacation.

 

“Not my monkeys, not my circus” anymore…

 

And I’m not a victim in any of this.  These are all the result of choices I’ve made, situations I’ve put myself into… Being able to own a voice is so foreign to me, having let others be my voice or chart my path.  That’s one thing that Robin William’s character was clear on – carpė diem, but with it comes the responsibility of facing consequences and owning our decisions, even if it means facing others’ opposition or challenges, as I have, learning to find my stride…

 

So yes, August 2014 has been a tough month on many levels, only to live through Robin’s suicide as well.  (No disrespect to his family…)

 

His death took me back to a time when I was much younger, yet still struggling to find my own voice – and also reinforced this current dark chapter, where I struggle to find again a foundation, a stride, a verse to contribute.  Community – ‘a sense of belonging.’ What is that? So many changes.  So many ebbs and flows.  Some friendships morph.  Some relations come and go.  Some leave me wondering if I’ll ever be able to replace this loneliness with the comfort and daily presence of another “S.O.” in my life.

 

Life I guess.  And I still don’t always know how to live it on life’s terms…

 

Lines from a song I came across stand out for me:
“Sometimes I think I’m better off to turn out the lights and close up shop. And give up the longing, believing in belonging, just hold down my head and take the loss.” (from Learn My Lessons, Daughtry)

 

And don’t worry.  I’m not going to follow in Robin’s footsteps (just for today…).  It’s just where I’ve been and where I am. I needed to walk this path as I find my stride.

 

Learning another set of lessons from life itself.  Finding my voice.

 

What is going to be my verse?  (Thanks Apple! 🙂

On a more positive note, I came across this tribute to Robin.  Powerful.

 

 

And I found a quote from his son:
“I lost my father and a best friend and the world got a little grayer,” said Zak Williams. “I will carry his heart with me every day. I would ask those that loved him to remember him by being as gentle, kind and generous as he would be. Seek to bring joy to the world as he sought.”

 

And I discovered an amazing and emotive article that speaks to the reality of the situation…as another author puts it, “he didn’t die from apparent suicide. He died from depression.” The one author gives a voice to depression – the ‘D’ I have known, the ‘D’ Robin knew, and the ‘D’ I will inevitably face again.

 

Which comes first the chicken or the egg?  The using or the depression. (my story…now some from hers…)

 

But as [the doctor] went down a list of symptoms, they were all there — loss of appetite, trouble sleeping, waves of irrational anxiety, crying for no reason, loss of interest in work and hobbies, isolation and seclusion. I had nearly every one of them.

 

Still, I refused to let myself completely off the hook, and as I left her office, I set forth on a path of self-discovery to identify how my actions might’ve contributed to how I felt — a path that quickly brought up the ever-confusing chicken and egg game.

 

Did I isolate myself from my friends because I was depressed? Or did I become depressed because I isolated myself from my friends?

 

I was more hesitant than usual to keep what was going on to myself, telling only my family and those closest to me at the time what the doctor had said. Soon it became clear that I needed the support of more than a select few if I was going to get through this. Plus, it’s not like me not to share what’s going on in my life. And isolating myself, I suspected, was partly to blame for being in this situation in the first place. So, at the inappropriate places and the most inopportune times I could find, I began dropping the “D-bomb.”

 

And then as always, this glimmer of hope – this phrase that makes it all worth living through because of the truth that emerges:

 

“Everything is OK.
Maybe not today, but eventually.”

 

She framed it and hung it near her bed, where she sees it every day.  As will I.

 

Thank you for walking this journey with me. It’s for me of course. If you found something helpful here, thank our universe.  Pretty cool…

 


Some wisdom from the movie script…
“No matter what anybody tells you, words and ideas can change the world.”

 

“Boys, you must strive to find your own voice. Because the longer you wait to begin, the less likely you are to find it at all. Thoreau said, “Most men lead lives of quiet desperation.” Don’t be resigned to that. Break out!”

 

“Now we all have a great need for acceptance, but you must trust that your beliefs are unique, your own, even though others may think them odd or unpopular, even though the herd may go, [imitating a goat] “that’s baaaaad.”

 

“Thank you, boys. Thank you.”

 


And on an unrelated but upbeat note, I’ll close with Mr. Rogers:
And because it’s such an amazing, creative piece of work:

My heartfelt and heartbroken, confused dedication to John.


Whenever I play this song, which I heard Cher sing in concert, I think of you. Sometimes there is still anger, and often there is confusion and always lack of closure. And I still sometimes get sad… But these are the words meant for you, from me…from my heart.

I still care for you and wish you the best. I hope you find what you’re looking for…

For John Andrew Bodine

These clouds aren’t going nowhere darling,
Rain keeps coming down.
I just thought I’d try to call you,
‘fore you got too far outta town.

And I hope that you get this message that I’m leaving for you.
‘Cause I hate that you left without hearing the words that I needed you to…

I hope you find it, what you’re looking for.
I hope it’s everything you dreamed your life could be and so much more…
And I hope you’re happy, wherever you are.
I wanted you to know that.
And nothing’s gonna change that.
I hope you find it.

Am I supposed to hang around and wait forever?
That’s the words I said.
But that was nothing but a broken heart talking, darling.
You know it wasn’t what I meant.
Call me up, let me know that you got this message that I’m leaving for you.
‘Cause I hate that you left without hearing the words I needed you to…

Whatever it is I have that you were missing here…
I hope you find it, what you’re looking for.
I hope it’s everything you dreamed your life could be and so much more…
And I hope you’re happy, wherever you are.
I wanted you to know that.
And nothing’s gonna change that.

I hope you find it…

20140726-165957-61197717.jpg

Why we can’t legislate change when it comes to reducing crime…


“The State of Indiana is poised to increase the prison time one must serve for murder and other violent crimes. New [guidelines will] raise the bar starting July 1, requiring violent criminals to serve at least 75 percent of their sentences. The current code has become notorious for allowing inmates to be released after serving just 50 percent of their sentences.”

There’s no data to say that “time behind bars” reduces the likelihood that someone will recommit a similar violent offense.  This is not reducing crime and making “the world a safer place.”

I have TWO CONCERNS with the news coverage on these upcoming changes, and some thoughts on what could be truly effective change…

 

CONCERN #1:  On the TV news piece on this new legislation, local police were interviewed and one officer stated “with these new sentencing guidelines, 25% more criminals will be off the streets.”

While that statement is mathematically precise, it is really saying nothing other than an answer to a simple (but meaningless) mathematics equation related to a body-count –

Q: how many people having been released early from prison would be on the ‘public streets’ at any given time?  

A: Yes, if they are in prison 25% longer, then it stands that at any given time, there would now be 25% less “on the streets…”

While that’s factually accurate, so what?

There is no data to support that leaving someone in prison longer will make a difference other than keeping more prisoners in prison than we do now!

These sentencing guidelines DO NOT

    • improve the overall effectiveness of our prison system, thus
    • improve our ability to “reform” someone, thus
    • reduce recidivism rates, thus
    • make the public streets safer

All we’ll be  doing is keeping 25% more people “on the other side of the prison wall.”

There is no data to support that leaving someone in prison longer will make a difference other than spending more taxpayer money than we do now!

These sentencing guidelines DO NOT

    • affect more or better change in an individual
    • improve public safety

The bottom line:  The streets are not 25% safer…we’ve just “delayed the inevitable,” and done so at a cost.

Did you know that it costs the same to house someone in prison for a year as it does to send someone to Harvard for a year!

The scarier bottom line: it’s a pretty steep cost for NO RESULT!

 

CONCERN #2:   On the news coverage on this new legislation specific cases are mentioned where violent crimes occurred and the suspects had been released early from prison.

    • In this online article, it described a three month span in a given city, where three murders occurred allegedly by convicted murderers (e.g. repeat offenders), and that two of these were released early from prison (both at ~50% of their full sentence).
    • In one case mentioned on TV,  the main suspect was released 3 months early from jail.

While these are are factually accurate descriptions, worse than meaningless statements, they are making dangerous implications that quite honestly are both unfounded and scary.

In other words, SO WHAT?

By tying the new guidelines to “actual cases,” without any other comparators, we’re being led to believe that there is historical evidence or actual proof that these guidelines

    • will REDUCE crime (because we can show that more time, less crime).
    • will PREVENT crime (because the threat of harsher sentences will keep people from committing crimes in the first place)

HELL NO.  HELL NO.

From the online article, all we know is that in a given time frame in one city, three murders occurred.  All we know is the recidivism rate for those three former prisoners is 100%.

Are we to believe that individuals are twice as likely to commit another violent crime if they’re released early?  NO!

Are we to believe that twice as many violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders who are released early?  NO!

From this sampling in the online article, we know nothing about about the new guidelines impact on recidivism…nothing about prison itself’s impact on recidivism…nothing about prison as a deterrent to crime!

    • Where there other convicted murderers in that city who served time who didn’t commit another murder (non-repeat offenders)?  We don’t know…
      • So we can’t draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of prison time on recidivism. 
    • Assuming there were, what ratio of those those non-repeat offenders served a partial sentence vs. full sentence?  We don’t know…
      • So we can’t draw any conclusions about the new sentencing guidelines on recidivism (e.g. was it better than 2:1?)
    • Were there other murders that occurred in that same time frame,  just not by former convicted murderers?  We don’t know…
      • So we can’t draw any conclusions about the effectiveness of prison in general on prevention!

And, if these were the ONLY three murders in the city at that time, then still all we sill know is the recidivism rate for those three former prisoners is 100%.

    • We can’t even say that prison time doesn’t reduce crime…we can’t draw any conclusions!

From the TV report, we know even less.  All we know, is the main suspect was released early from jail.

Are we to believe that had he not been released early, he wouldn’t have committed another violent crime?  NO!

All the data on recidivism would say that the individual would be just as likely to commit another similar violent crime…just 3 months later.

 

In these new stories, the reporters are implying that the guidelines would have changed the outcomes of recent deaths by shooting.  But there is no data to support this.

They are just ‘playing on our emotions” to lead us to believe that this simple solution will have an impact on crime.  It won’t.

 

IN CONCLUSION:  spending money “to keep doing the same thing for longer” with no data to support better results is DANGEROUSLY MISLEADING. It’s also the definition of insanity – banging your head against the same wall, expecting different results.

 

BUT while it’s great for me to point out the uselessness of their mathematically precision and the danger of their stories that play on our emotions,

DO I HAVE A BETTER ANSWER?  Hell Yes.

Instead of spending more money on  longer sentencing, we should spend that money in one of two ways:

    • reactively speaking, research better ways to help someone learn not to repeat a given undesirable behavior (i.e. recommit a similar crime)…which really means finding better things for that person to do with the same time interval…outside of prison!  This addresses criminal recidivism (and it probably involves us in community, not the government, to find the answers…)
    • proactively speaking, research solutions to address issues like poverty, substance abuse, child abuse, and social intolerance which lead to someone growing up to commit a violent crime….which really means finding ways to keep people out of prison in the first place.  This addresses crime prevention (and it probably involves us in community, not the government or schools, to find the answers…)

DO I HAVE AN EASIER ANSWER?  Hell No!

These are not simple solutions – we can’t just legislate change, throw money at the problem or lock people up and hope the problem solves itself.  We must get involved, and fundamentally “shift the conversation.”

Which is why you probably won’t like my answers…

…which is precisely why our legislators try these solutions.

They appear simple, keep the public happy, and get them re-elected.  

But they do NOT fundamentally adrress the problem with a better solution!

And, our legislators are NOT to blame!  We’re the ones at fault…because we fall for it!

But just because something is hard, doesn’t mean it’s not the right thing to do!